I Don’t Get It
April 26th, 2007-9:10 pm by sub2changeWhen I posted that bit about the Iraqi WMDs, Jay Bullock and I exchanged a few emails over the validity of the story. I was going to share our conversation with you, until I realized that there was something bigger bothering me.
The debate over WMDs and the justification for invading Iraq astounds me. Even if you consider just the information that the American public had at the time, I think the war was more than justified. Here are just a few of the things we knew from watching the 11 o’clock news:
Saddam had WMDs somewhere. Ralph Nader (a staunch liberal) politely pointed out that we, the United States, had receipts for some of them.
Saddam used chemical weapons on his people (unless you’re a Sunni, and you don’t count Kurds as “your people”). There are pictures floating around if you want to see them.
Some of the materials that we knew he had were unaccounted for. Saddam played a constant shell game with the UN inspectors who were searching for them.
Saddam’s handling of the UN inspections was anything but forthcoming. In the end, our government politely informed the UN that we were enforcing their treaty for them. Thank you very much.
Leaving a sneaky little jerk like Saddam in power was a recipe for disaster. Sooner or later it was going to hurt somebody, it might already be too late. Time will tell.
The diplomatic/economic solution wasn’t working. It takes a pretty thick-headed liberal not to see that; you know, the kind who can explain why Saddam was a threat to Bill Clinton’s administration in 1998 and not in 2001.
The alternative to diplomatic pressure is the use of force. Perhaps it would’ve been preferable to take Saddam out quietly and covertly? Yes, but our government has some unfortunate rules about assassinating foreign heads of state. So, the only option left to remove Saddam was a military one.
As we’ve searched Iraq, we haven’t found massive stockpiles of weapons. But, we haven’t come back entirely empty handed, either. Some of the following reports may have been false, but we were told by the MSM that we found the following:
Missiles with capability beyond the UN prescribed maximum range.
Small stockpiles of chemicals and/or empty barrels.
Mass graves. Not the mark of a benevolent leader.
Planes buried in the sand. Typically, a legitimate air force is stored above ground, in hangers!
One or more of the chemical/dual purpose trucks that Colin Powell described. It was squeaky clean, to the point of being suspicious. No doubt, it was actually being used by a local tribesman to make ice cream, right?
Saddam Hussein, cowering in a dark hole in the city he grew up in. Could he have been searching for his mommy?
Insurgents using chlorine gas as a weapon. Where are they getting it? Who’s supplying it? Why?Â
Saddam needed to go. Before the war, even congress agreed on it. We’re better off without him. The Iraqis will be too, if they get it together. Right now there’s a certain amount of tit-for-tat retaliation going on, and the Sunnis are paying for the protection they enjoyed under their tyrant leader. Our new mission is to see that the Iraqi people get it out of their system as soon as possible.
Posted in Iraq | 1 Comment »







